Cryptozoo

I broke off price negotiations with Ryunwoofie one time because she wanted to charge me for not having color refs of a black and white zebra character. Now I'm glad it didn't go through.

As of today, Hi-Ku has repaid me in full for the commission.

On 1/26/2021 at 9:43 PM, sbneko said:

Not impressed that in a journal she says she earned the money. I'm sorry but that money is not earned until the art is done. 

The stuff that she recently posted for Dec-Feb has been 2/3 personal art or commissions from other platforms like VK. It's pretty inexplicable how she's been doing all this business and yet couldn't provide updates to people on FA.

15 hours ago, Sophibarks said:

I never understood the practice of blocking a client when they point out something that needs to be pointed out.

The purpose is to strip complaints and criticism from her FA page because her business model is to rope in new customers that have not seen the warnings she's already cleared out of her shouts. 

28 minutes ago, Spectacle197 said:

You can still get the refund. I doubt she's going homeless over this. 

The time limit has elapsed already. I'm not all that concerned about it, just interested in not seeing the cycle repeat itself yet again.

21 minutes ago, RTKobold said:

Between this beware, toastypoodle and now your experience with her this says quite a lot about her buisness practices.

I would be very interested in knowing the original content of the comments that she removed from her 'Need help' journal.

I had a similar situation with her. The six-month point for acommission was approaching so I filed for a refund with PayPal. She finally responded to that and was very angry about it. Things broke down to the point that I no longer wanted to speak to her.

I let her keep the money (I didn't think it was worth potentially making someone homeless over, as she claims). So despite getting money from me for doing nothing and even recycling the YCH I'd claimed, she posted a 'blacklist' on her TOS calling me out by name that I had to get taken down by the FA admins.

I seriously doubt that a TOS where the artist tries to forbid chargebacks under any circumstance is valid, especially when journals on FA can be edited at will. PayPal certainly doesn't agree with the idea.

She seems to have no idea how running a business works and has a strong sense of entitlement.